In her essay on photography Susan Sontag seems to contradict
herself, or at the very least provide multiple sides of an argument with the
tone that each is her personal belief. I had begun to jot down responses to
individual points before I had read the whole essay, and ended up finding my
own arguments later in her text. Whether this is purposeful or not, Sontag
illustrates multiple conceptions of photography, it’s purpose, it’s abilities,
and the connotation surrounding it in a short essay. The most important of
these, to me at least, were two of the largest conceptions surrounding
photography. It is used as evidence, as documentation, an appropriated piece of
the world or a time as a (mostly) objective image, but is also always subject
to the photographers intent, their own understanding, composition and crop.
These contrasting ideas conflict even more today, in a technically advanced
society, as photos can be easily taken by anyone, but also reproduced, edited,
and pushed further out of context by the same people. Photographs are seen as
indisputable evidence, but also tabloidial falsehoods that are as far removed
from their true context as any colorfully dictated rumor.
Aside from their inherent validity or congruence to some
absolute truth, photographs are probably more important as cultural artifacts
that preserve a feeling of a time. Whether any individual photo strives to be
as true to a moments reality is moot, as the collective photos from a time
period (obviously after the invention
of photographer) give us a view into the subject matter and individuals of a
time, as well as the periods photographic styles and trends. This window into
time will only become clearer as children grow up as both the subject and users
of social media. We have taken to documenting absolutely every aspect of our
lives. Photography, whether objective or opinionated is the greatest tool of
documentation we have ever created, and we have only just begun to see its
effects on social interaction, privacy, and culture as a whole.